DDR-ARCV / 001Doordoorium

A dispute · spans 5 eras

Being vs. Becoming

Is reality fundamentally stable, or fundamentally in motion?

The oldest argument in philosophy. Parmenides argued that what truly is must be one, eternal, and unchanging — change is contradictory and our senses are lying. Heraclitus argued the opposite: reality is process, change is the only stable thing, and stability is just temporary form. Plato sided with Parmenides (the Forms are unchanging), Aristotle tried to do justice to both, modern physics has tilted toward Heraclitus, and Hegel's whole philosophy is in some sense Heraclitus winning the argument 2,400 years later.

◇ ◇ ◇

// The sides

Being

Reality is one, eternal, unchanging.

Becoming

Reality is process, change, becoming.

Both

There are unchanging principles, but they operate on changing things.