DDR-ARCV / 001Doordoorium

A dispute · spans 3 eras

The Problem of Universals

Do universal categories — redness, humanity — exist independently of the things that have them?

Three red apples share something we call "redness." Is redness a real thing — existing somehow alongside the apples, perhaps in a Platonic heaven? Or is it merely the name we give to a useful resemblance? The dispute organized medieval philosophy. Realists (Plato, Aquinas) said universals are real. Nominalists (Ockham) said only particulars are real and universals are names. Conceptualists said universals exist as ideas in minds. The dispute is alive: contemporary debates in metaphysics, philosophy of mathematics, and natural-kind theory all replay it.

◇ ◇ ◇

// The sides

Realism

Universals are real entities independent of minds.

Nominalism

Only particulars are real. Universals are names.